In 2006, a further provisional arrangement was agreed between Australia and Timor-Leste. The treaty on Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea (CMATS) changed the revenue sharing of all of the Greater Sunrise field to a 50:50 split between Australia and Timor-Leste.
At the same time, CMATS placed a moratorium on maritime boundary delimitation for as long as CMATS and the Timor Sea Treaty are in force – that is, for 50 years (potentially until 2057, or in any event until the Greater Sunrise field is fully exploited).
Either Australia or Timor-Leste can terminate CMATS, as they have the right to do so under the terms of the treaty itself (since a development plan for the Greater Sunrise field has not been approved and petroleum production has not commenced). Notably, if either country were to terminate CMATS, the Timor Sea Treaty would also no longer be in force.
Timor-Leste is currently disputing the validity of this treaty. For more information see here.
The largest known oil and gas field in the Timor Sea is Greater Sunrise made up of the Sunrise and Troubadour gas-condensate deposits. A Unitisation Agreement was agreed between Australia and Timor-Leste regarding the Greater Sunrise field. The treaty states that 20.1% of Greater Sunrise lies within the JPDA and 79.9% lies to the east of the JPDA.
While it was negotiated and signed several years earlier, the Unitisation Agreement did not come into force until 23 February 2007, the same time as the Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea treaty came into force.
The Timor Sea Treaty was signed on the first day of the restoration of Timor-Leste’s independence (20 May 2002). Like the 2001 Timor Sea Arrangement, the Timor Sea Treaty reflected the provisions of the Timor Gap Treaty.
Area A of the Zone of Cooperation created under the Timor Gap Treaty was effectively replaced with the Joint Petroleum Development Area (JPDA).
The Timor Sea Treaty gives 90% of revenue rights within the JPDA to Timor-Leste and 10% to Australia. The Timor Sea Treaty also creates a three-tiered administrative structure:
In anticipation of Timorese independence, Australia and the United Nations Transitional Authority in East Timor (UNTAET) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on the Timor Sea. The MOU set out much of the text that was later adopted under the Timor Sea Treaty. Notably, this was the first time that the United Nations had negotiated an agreement on behalf of a soon-to-be independent country.
The 1997 Exclusive Economic Zone Agreement between Australia and Indonesia appears to be based on a median line boundary for water column rights (i.e. fishing). Seabed rights (i.e. oil and gas) were separately agreed under the 1972 Seabed Boundary Agreement between them. The agreement was signed by both countries, however it was never ratified.
In an attempt to ‘close the Timor Gap’, Australia and Indonesia agreed the Timor Gap Treaty in 1989. By negotiating the Timor Gap Treaty while Indonesia occupied Timor-Leste, Australia recognised Indonesian sovereignty over Timor-Leste. Portugal protested against the treaty at the International Court of Justice, however the Court ruled it could not exercise jurisdiction over Indonesia, which at that time did not accept the jurisdiction of the Court.
The treaty created three separate zones, including an area (roughly corresponding to the present-day Joint Petroleum Development Area) in which there was a 50:50 split of revenue rights for oil and gas produced in that zone between Australia and Indonesia. When Timor-Leste became a sovereign nation, the treaty ceased to have effect. However the substance of the Timor Gap Treaty was used to form the basis of the Timor Sea Treaty between Australia and Timor-Leste.
This agreement between Australia and Indonesia created a seabed (also known as the ‘continental shelf’) boundary between Australia and Indonesia in the Timor Sea. As Portugal was exercising sovereignty over Timor-Leste, which was known as Portuguese Timor at the time, and decided not to participate in negotiations regarding the Timor Sea, Australia and Indonesia did not have jurisdiction to agree to a maritime boundary in the Timor Sea south of Portuguese Timor. As a result, they left a gap between certain points in the Timor Sea, known as the ‘Timor Gap’.
While boundary negotiations between States often remain confidential, it is widely believed that the boundary line was largely based on the continental shelf principle. This meant that the boundary line along the seabed was further north (closer to Indonesia) than the median line. As it was created under a bilateral treaty and Timor-Leste was not a party to it, this treaty and the boundary is not binding on Timor-Leste.
This website is hosted by the Maritime Boundary Office of the Council for the Final Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries to allow readers to learn more about Timor-Leste’s pursuit of permanent maritime boundaries. The Council for the Final Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries and the Maritime Boundary Office do not accept any legal liability for any reliance placed on any information contained in this website (including external links). The information provided is a summary only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. The information and views expressed in this website and in any linked information do not constitute diplomatic representations and do not limit or otherwise affect the rights of the Council for the Final Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries, the Maritime Boundary Office or the Government of Timor-Leste. The views expressed in any linked information do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council for the Final Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries, the Maritime Boundary Office or the Government of Timor-Leste.
GFM is the acronym for “Gabinete das Fronteiras Marítimas”, which is the Portuguese translation of Maritime Boundary Office.